Notes

Owned by Katrine Hofmann Gasser
Last updated: Jun 12, 2017

Primary target groups

  • Policy Makers (universities/DMforum)
  • Library Communities (staff + mgm)

---

  • Need clear conclusions for both target groups
  • Maybe 1pager conclusions for different target groups
  • Articles, conference papers... (follow up activity)
  • Identify gaps
  • Library role - current + future
  • Presentation on DeiC 2017?
  • More extensive summary
  • Conclusiions as capability model?
  • Publish FAIR
  • Distribution plan?
  • Printet version that can be handed out

Wiki (August-September)

  • Be fair
  • Do initital cleanup of what can be deleted now
  • Try complete dump to PDF
  • Only public available pages

Network

  • DM Forum
  • DMPonline project
  • Smaller networks (SDU + KU
  • RCR-network
  • Need of mailing-list? (DeiC) - open to all
  • Input for DeiC - website
  • NeiC Pooling. Code refinery
  • Library/Archive meetup in 6months (teaching) include CBS and ITU

 

Conclusions

Policy

- no reccomendations, but lack of policy makes practice difficult

- fallback is Code of Conduct, legal regulations, ethics, funders

Include feedback from researchers

Libraries are a very small part of a big eco system

  • many many infrastructures (local, nation, european, global)
  • still new needs - closing the gaps


Libraries role (close coorporation with universities)

Data Management Planning

Pre-award: not really covered in DMiP

Post-award - training, consulting, running the service, support, development

 

Managing Active Data

consultancy, guidance, follow the plan

not very large role, metadata, re-planning, documentation


Select+deposit:

Metadata, structuring dataset, finding the best repository,  cataloging, searchability, citation, training


Training: potentially for all kinds of staff for all services (workflow toolkit)


Uni-view: facilitate data governance


Long term preservation

National Archives, Royal Danish Library

 

Practical

Data Management Plans should be included (.pdf)

Structure: Hum Cases (should be aligned)

Conclusion in chapter 8

RUB: note regarding cases (also in the figure)

Service model (reference)

The Royal Danish Libray

Sensitive data (consistens)

Avoid "we" term

Evaluation (assesment)

 

Conclusion

The cases were very different

The differences between the diciplines

Table w. life cycle (theme) check wiki ( Cph 19th of april - should be updated )