Primary target groups

---

Wiki (August-September)

Network

Conclusions

Policy

- no reccomendations, but lack of policy makes practice difficult

- fallback is Code of Conduct, legal regulations, ethics, funders

Include feedback from researchers

Libraries are a very small part of a big eco system

Libraries role (close coorporation with universities)

Data Management Planning

Pre-award: not really covered in DMiP

Post-award - training, consulting, running the service, support, development

Managing Active Data

consultancy, guidance, follow the plan

not very large role, metadata, re-planning, documentation

Select+deposit:

Metadata, structuring dataset, finding the best repository, cataloging, searchability, citation, training

Training: potentially for all kinds of staff for all services (workflow toolkit)

Uni-view: facilitate data governance

Long term preservation

National Archives, Royal Danish Library

Practical

Data Management Plans should be included (.pdf)

Structure: Hum Cases (should be aligned)

Conclusion in chapter 8

RUB: note regarding cases (also in the figure)

Service model (reference)

The Royal Danish Libray

Sensitive data (consistens)

Avoid "we" term

Evaluation (assesment)

Conclusion

The cases were very different

The differences between the diciplines

Table w. life cycle (theme) check wiki ( Cph 19th of april - should be updated )

Browser not supported