Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Digital data

  • Project website or informal sharing is not recommended for long-term preservation or re-use of data, because while informal data sharing can offer immediate storage and easy access, the long-term sustainability of data through websites is an issue manage and burden to accomplish. Furthermore, if the data is not open data, it is difficult to control usage and handle requests to access data.
  • Funders, institutions and journals may specify where data should be placed in specialist data archives, platforms, or institutional repositories. These guarantee long-term storage and back up of data, alongside managed re-use. There are disadvantages, though, because for instance grant-funded subject repositories occasionally, that don’t have sustainable business models may shut down after their funding runs out, so it is important to have a plan ready in case this occurs.
  • Self-archiving platforms allow you to upload your research data. These platforms allow for quick upload of data with minimal metadata requirements. They then receive a catalogue record, licence, and Digital Object Identifier for citation.
Global general data repositories

Open to all kinds of data, but has a 2GB file size limit. This limit may increase to a much higher number. There is no upper limit to the total dataset size, though. Data can be either open or closed access.

...

...

...

Danish data repositories 

...

If one prefers to store data in a Danish repository some examples are mentioned here. It may also be the case that a counselor tells that research data by law has to be stored in a Danish registry. 

...

danish registry, because, for instance, the data are sensitive. It has been hard to find a suitable general Danish repository and none of those that are mentioned here is satisfactory.

Non-digital data

...